If this book isn’t badly written, then why is it still bad?
Should travel writers deliberately look for interesting stories or just go with the flow?
Is it possible for a traveler to be too intellectual, and how could this impact his writing?
Why is this book still so awesome after so many years?
Was this a 14th-century fact finding mission or just another medieval mystery tale?
Why do these travel stories from 19th century Germany remain so recommendable?
Why is it so much fun to read Medieval travel stories that are at least partly untrue?
Did conservative ethics turn this great adventure story into such a slow read?
Is this German classic really that awesome, or could it be just a bit overrated?